ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Partnering with the largest Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in New Haven, CT, the goal is to implement and test 4 evidence-based interventions (EBI) to increase CRC screening, while evaluating real-world implementation. Here, we report on the six-month (approximate) follow up of a cohort of 3,127 patients overdue for CRC screening who received 1 or more EBIs in October 2021. BACKGROUND: Sociocultural and medical concerns are barriers to colonoscopy uptake contributing to disparities in CRC screening. An additional barrier is system level capacity. COVID-19 associated delays exacerbated the existing backlog of individuals overdue for CRC screening, underscoring the need to expand Fecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) capacity. This was particularly evident in the safety-net primary care setting that serves lower socio-economic status individuals living in urban New Haven, CT. METHOD(S): We are testing the unique and additive value of multiple evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for increasing CRC screening. The EBIs include the use of medical reminders, addressing the structural barriers (social determinants of health [SDOH]), and providing assistance from community health workers (CHW). We randomized 3,127 patients overdue for CRC screening to one of 4 arms of the study. All individuals received a reminder from their providers that they were due/overdue for CRC screening with instructions to contact the FQHC. Arm 2 also included information on SDOH barriers, Arm 3 included this same information with offer of navigation from CHW/navigator;and Arm 4 included the offer of CHW educational video and support if needed. Six-month (approximate) outcomes include: 1) Engagement with FQHC resulting in ordered test;2) completed test. Results by intervention will be assessed at 12 months. RESULT(S): Of the 3,127 randomized patients, ages 50-75, 77% were Hispanic (33%) or Black (44%). At 6+ months, a preliminary look at EMR data show that a minimum of 1,275 (40.8%) patients "engaged" with providers resulting in an ordered FIT Kit (n= 1174) or COMPLETED screening colonoscopy that was not associated with a positive FIT result (n = 102). 217 (18.5%) individuals completed the FIT testing with 13 requiring confirmatory colonoscopy (31% completed at this time). Thus, a minimum of 319 (10%) of 3,127 individuals in the cohort completed CRC screening at approximately 6 months post intervention. DISCUSSION: Despite investments in community engagement, stakeholder input, and FIT kit capacity building, the pandemic presented unforeseen challenges. Flexibility and steadfast commitment from FQHC providers and staff were critical to successful implementation during multiple waves of COVID-19, resulting in CRC screening ordered for 41% of cohort within 6 months of intervention. SUMMARY: At 6 months follow up of 3,127 individual who were overdue for CRC screening, one or more of 4 EBIs, in addition to system level efforts to address CRC screening, resulted CRC screening tests ordered for 41% of cohort with at least 10% completed screening.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: We partnered with a local Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) to test implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBI) promoting Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) CRC screening in an environment in which colonoscopy has been the prevailing screening strategy. We report on implementation adaptations and preliminary results. Background: Sociocultural and medical concerns are barriers to colonoscopy uptake in some populations. An additional barrier to CRC screening is system level capacity for colonoscopy that results in a back log of cases and long wait times. With Covid-19, the additional backlog in overdue CRC screening has underscored the need to expand FIT testing capacity to address screening needs and to pre-empt further racial/ethnic and SES disparities in CRC outcomes. This trial tests the unique and additive value of multiple EBIs for increasing CRC screening (primarily through FIT testing, but also colonoscopy when indicated) while evaluating the success of implementing these approaches. EBIs include the use of medical reminders, addressing the structural barriers (social determinants of health [SDOH]), and assistance from community health workers. Methods: Participants (3500), ages 45-75, were identified from a large FQHC in New Haven, CT and determined to be overdue for CRC screening. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the four arms of the study: 1) Provider reminder (overdue for CRC screening) only;2) Provider Reminder + SDOH short message and one-size-fits all link to resources;3) Provider Reminder + SDOH short message and offer for individualized navigation (trained navigators from local community) to address SDOH and other barriers;4) Provider Reminder + offer to participate in a CRC educational program as phase 2 of the NCI's Screen to Save program (not an EBI). Preliminary data on uptake of CRC screening will be presented. Results: With input from stakeholders, we have: 1) lowered age eligibility from 50 to 45 to align with new guidelines;2) expanded the target population to 2 additional satellite clinics, more than doubling the proposed study enrollment;3) incorporated design changes in the patient reminders. The collaboration between research team and clinician stakeholders has been critical in minimizing disruptions to clinical workflow while assuring fidelity to the evidence-based interventions. Preliminary outcomes (within one month of intervention) on uptake of intervention across the 4 arms of the study, i.e., referral for CRC screening and test completion will be presented. Conclusion: The unique challenges of this urban community of primarily African American/Black, Hispanic/Latinx and/or low socioeconomic status individuals stem from the disproportionate burden of SDOH barriers. Findings will inform primary care setting implementation of EBIs to address the anticipated increase in disparities in CRC screening, exacerbated by COVID-19 changes in health care access and utilization, as well as the increased demand associated with the change in guidelines.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Assess consumer experience and health impact among under-resourced individuals who were enrolled into longitudinal navigation to address social determinants of health (SDOH) needs and health goals related to cancer primary and secondary prevention. Background: The Yale Cancer Disparities Firewall Project is a multi-tiered initiative to address the social determinants of health (SDOH) and other challenges that prevent at-risk communities from receiving the full benefit of the many available cancer prevention and cancer screening options. A communityfacing health navigation program, staffed by community members who have received extensive multidisciplinary training is a central component of this program. Methods: Of the 61 currently enrolled individuals (all of whom are either African American/Black or Hispanic/Latinx), we collected questionnaire data from 24 individuals (39% response rate). In general, participants are enrolled for a minimum of 1 year, but most have been followed for 2 years. Respondents were similar to non-respondents with respect to race (60% were Black/African American vs 61.2%, respectively) and age (mean = 44.8 vs 47.2 years, respectively). Respondents were more likely to be female (85% vs 71.4%, p =.009), Hispanic/Latinx (35% vs 42%), but significantly less likely to be foreign-born (15% vs 26.5 %, p = .021). We assessed satisfaction with assigned navigator(s), uptake of referred services, knowledge gained, health behavior change, and self-rated health (SRH). Results: Per self-report, 79.2% of participants agreed and a further 12.5% somewhat agreed that they were overall satisfied with their experience with the health navigation program. Importantly, two-thirds (66.7%) agreed and a further 20.8% somewhat agreed that they changed their behavior to improve their health and well-being because of the program. Of the 5 health focused services offered, the most commonly reported uptake was physical activity (87.5%), followed by learning how to eat healthier and losing weight. Additionally, one third (33.3%) of participants received assistance with reducing or stopping smoking. In terms of secondary prevention, 62.5% of clients received assistance with cancer screening. Of the 5 SDOH focused services offered, the most common was assistance with finding food to eat (66.7%) followed by assistance with paying utilities (45.8%), a shift from the priority needs at baseline (40% needing food assistance, and 35% with housing concerns), presumably reflecting the additional strains associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: Against the backdrop of COVID-19, these findings suggest that addressing SDOH barriers through individual navigation is an important add-on service when facilitating access to services to maintain healthy lifestyle and adhere to cancer screening guidelines. Although this was a pilot program, we foresee the opportunity to utilize trained non-clinical navigators and/or community health workers and to promote cancer prevention in at risk communities.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Employing a social determinants of health (SDOH) framework including race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES) (education, income) and other barriers we: 1) Describe the impact of COVID-19 on young adults (GENZ) who live in CT;2) Determine if COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is related to other vaccine utilization (HPV and Flu) and other cancer prevention behaviors Background: As is well recognized from previous pandemics and epidemics, the burden of disease falls disproportionately on those individuals with fewest resources. It is now clear that the COVID-19 associated death and disease burden in minority and low socioeconomic communities is disproportionate to their numbers in the general population. In addition to the disproportionate acute impact of the COVID-19 on vulnerable communities, the long-term impact may be lost ground with respect to cancer prevention due to disruption, distrust and misinformation. Little is known about how the pandemic has impacted young adults and whether this has influenced behaviors that are key to cancer prevention. Methods: In May, 2021, we conducted a Qualtrics survey assessing all aspects of COVID-19 impact, with extensive SDOH measures, including everyday racism and medical mistrust, cancer prevention and screening, access to health care, and intentions regarding future vaccination uptake, adherence to COVID-19 preventive practices, lifestyle behaviors associated with cancer prevention, and cancer screening. Participants (n=232) are 18-25 year olds with a permanent address in Connecticut. We used social networks and social media to recruit participants. Analysis includes descriptive and multivariate adjusted logistic regression findings predicting maintenance of healthy lifestyle (primary cancer prevention) and cancer screening and associations with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Results: In this sample of young adults, the average age was 21.2 (range 18-25), with 52% reporting their race/ethnicity as Hispanic/Latinx (33%) or African American/Black (19%);53.3% were female, 46.2% were male, and .4% reported other. Descriptive data demonstrate high levels of SDOH and the impact of COVID-19 on many aspects of life for this study population. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was relatively low at 12.2%, with 57% of GENZ participants reporting that they had already vaccinated. We present predictors of healthy lifestyle behaviors and intention to adhere to cancer screening guidelines going forward and the relationship to history of and intent to vaccinate against COVID-19. Conclusion: The unique challenges of young adults during COVID-19 are not well documented. Findings will inform community level interventions in the event of continued COVID-19 (or similar) public health challenges, while identifying opportunities to advance cancer prevention long-term for these young adults.